Oklahoma’s execution drug combo OK’d by federal judge:

We always try to figure out why the court systems can not get anything accomplished. To begin with, many of the the judges are not triathletes and are very slow out of the starting blocks. Next they are bogged down with frivolous law suits such as the one in Oklahoma.

What the hell is all of the hoopla about what kind of drug should be used when executing people that are sentenced to death? There is more consideration given to the criminal to make sure their passing is comfortable and their rights were not violated than was given to their victims.

Recently some inmates in Colorado that were scheduled for the chopping block sued the state after the April 29 execution of Clayton Lockett, who did the Saint Vitus Dance on the gurney he was strapped to and suffered for 43-minute execution, that the state tried to halt before it was over.

Am I missing something? Aren’t these convicted criminals supposed to suffer? Let’s put this into prospective. Lockett was convicted of murder, rape and kidnapping. I can be sure that his victim did not experience a peaceful death.

Lockett’s execution was the first in Oklahoma that used a new cocktail mixture with midazolam, which also has been used in problematic executions in Ohio and Arizona.

As far as I am concerned, I still believe in an eye for and eye; that only seems fair to me.

I remember not too long ago, a guy that was sentenced to death and his ambulance chaser put up a big stink as the whether the needle that was going to be used in his execution was sterile or not.  What is the difference??

One other thing I find very amusing with some of the carrier criminals. Many of them see GOD after the fact. It would be nice if they had their apparition before they committed the crimes.